Planned Parenthood's treachery

Yesterday, the evil vaccine Gardasil was approved for routine use on eleven- and twelve-year-old girls and even for use on girls as young as nine. In case you haven't read my previous posts, Gardasil prevents cervical cancer, a disease that only people who have sex can get. Adding to this assault on innocence and virginity is the fact that Planned Parenthood, an organization that I thought was pro-choice, has announced its belief that all girls should be forced to receive the vaccine in order to attend public schools. Additionally, Merck, the evil manufacturer of Gardasil, is planning to see if the vaccine can be given to boys. The actions of Merck and Planned Parenthood are based on an assumption that all people will have sex and therefore are an affront to all bachelors and maidens of the world. I stand for childhood and celibacy, I oppose Gardasil with all my heart, and I will not give a single inch! Merck, Planned Parenthood, and other anti-celibate organizations must be defeated. For a start, here are a couple of addresses that you can write to:

Planned Parenthood:
communications@ppfa.org
Planned Parenthood Federation of America
434 West 33rd St.
New York, NY 10001

Merck:
Merck & Co., Inc.
One Merck Drive
P.O. Box 100
Whitehouse Station, NJ 08889-0100 USA

Harry Potter news

J.K. Rowling recently gave some interesting, but still mysterious, clues about Book 7. On a British talk show, she disclosed that the final chapter in the series, which she wrote in 1990, has undergone some minor changes. One character whom Rowling planned to kill off has gotten a reprieve, at least partly because Rowling's husband objected to having the character die. To make up for this, two characters will die who were not originally planned to. Rowling hinted that the characters who die are major characters; she also made some controversial comments that some have interpreted as pointing to the fact that Harry will die.

Also, the first promotional picture from the 5th Harry Potter movie is out, and Harry seems to have much shorter hair than he did in the 4th movie! I am pleased with this. Although I don't like Harry's new hair as much as his hair in the first two movies, I hated his hair (and Ron's too) in the 4th movie and am glad it doesn't look like that again! Also in the hair department, Mugglenet has a clip of a skit that Potter actors Dan Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, and Emma Watson filmed for Queen Elizabeth's 80th birthday. In the skit, Ron, as well as Harry, seems to have shorter hair. Although Hermione's hair looks the same in the skit, I saw a few pictures of her at the Queen's birthday (after the skit was filmed), and she has bangs! I'm not going to get my hopes up, because this seems too good to believe, but there might be a possibility she has bangs in the 5th movie. This would be awesome, as I liked her hairdo with bangs in the first two movies much better than the hairdo in the later films.

In case you aren't following what I'm saying, which is quite possible since I seem to be rambling on, or if you want to see the information and pictures for yourself, which is also highly likely, go to http://mugglenet.com

Bad Rush Limbaugh!

I was appalled to read this morning that Rush Limbaugh was detained at an airport for having Viagra with a prescription in someone else's name! The problem isn't the dubious prescription (I don't believe in requiring prescriptions for any medications), but the Viagra itself! Viagra is completely immoral and should be outlawed! I have no idea why anyone would ever want to use it. Think about what it does! For the life of me, I don't understand why anyone would want a medication that does that. If there was a pill that did the opposite, then that would be useful! I can't believe that a conservative icon like Limbaugh would ever use Viagra.

To Limbaugh's credit, however, I must point out that the radio commentator made a great joke about the incident on his radio show. He said that he got the Viagra from the Clinton Presidential Library, having been told that it was blue M&Ms!

As always, go to CNN for the full story.

P.S. I apologize for not posting for so long. There has not been much in the news lately, with the exception of the Justin Barber trial, which I have been watching on Court TV for the past two weeks or so. On Monday a jury recommended that Barber receive the death penalty for killing his wife. Although the trial is mostly over, it is still ascinating to read about, so check out the following links:

http://www.courttv.com/trials/barber
http://www.news4jax.com/news/9404235/detail.html
http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/local/news-article.aspx?storyid=59565
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/LegalCenter/story?id=2101466&page=1
http://www.staugustine.com/news/barber/

Down with Gardasil!

There has been a victory in the war on terror: Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, known as the "Prince of Al Qaeda" was killed by the Air Force in Iraq. He was considered the 2nd most important member of Al Qaeda, after Osama bin Laden, of course.

In other news, the FDA has made a decision that threatens to destroy innocence and personal freedom everywhere. A vaccine called Gardasil was approved for use today. This vaccine, made by Merck, is an abomination. It prevents women from getting the HPV virus, which can only be transmitted sexually. In other words, only immoral people are in danger of getting the virus, and they don't deserve to be protected from it. But, because the vast majority of people are ageist and unindividualistic, girls as young as nine, who might end up being celibate, will be forced by their parents into getting the shots.

Now, I already knew all of this, but here's something I had never heard before: the states will eventually be able to decide whether or not to make HPV vaccines mandatory in order to attend public schools!!!!! That's right, if a state votes in favor of this, everyone in the state will be forced to receive painful, dread-inducing shots for a sexually transmitted disease, even though there's a chance some of the people will remain virgins for their entire lives.

This issue infuriates me more than any current event I can remember. At least with gay marriage, which I consider despicable, the gay people are just being despicable with each other and not bothering anyone else. States' plans for Gardasil, however, smash the rights of celibates and are more oppressive than any idea Adolf Hitler ever conceived. Gardasil is an affront to logic, childhood, dignity, innocence, independence, individualism, freedom, and the Constitution of the United States of America!

Making Gardasil mandatory is, quite possibly, the worst idea I have ever heard. It is a Communist policy that reflects the evil philosophy of collectivism and has absolutely no place in America. George Washington, Patrick Henry, John Adams, and all other great Americans from history are most certainly rolling in their graves at the knowledge of this terrible monstrosity. Anyone who supports making Gardasil mandatory ought to be shot.

I vow that I will never in my life receive an HPV vaccine, and may God strike me down if I ever break my vow. If Gardasil is ever made mandatory in my home state of Massachusetts, which is frighteningly likely knowing how disgustingly liberal my state tends to be, I will fight against the vaccine with all the strength I possess. In fact, I will dedicate time and resources to combatting this abomination wherever it reigns, and all true Americans will, at least in spirit, join me.

In conclusion, I say down with Gardasil! Down with Merck! Down with the FDA! And down with anyone who supports making Gardasil mandatory, as anyone who supports that also supports the destruction of innocence, logic, and freedom everywhere!!!

Gay marriage ban defeated

Not surprisingly, the Senate failed to approve a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. Here's what the text of the amendment would have been:

"Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman. Neither this Constitution, nor the constitution of any State, shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon any union other than the union of a man and a woman."

I support such an amendment for the most part, but here are the pros and cons:

Reasons to oppose an anti-gay-marriage amendmentt:

• The amendment is known as the "Marriage Protection Amendment" -- I have no desire to protect marriage, as it is an immoral institution that ought to be abolished
• Supporters of the amendment (including President Bush and Speaker Bill Frist) have made gross comments about how marriage helps to create a moral society and is "the most fundamental institution of civilization"

Reasons to support an anti-gay-marriage amendment:

• Opponents of the amendment have made statements just as gross as those of its supporters. For example, according to Ted Kennedy, "The Republican leadership is asking us to spend time writing bigotry into the Constitution. A vote for it is a vote against civil unions, against domestic partnership, against all other efforts for states to treat gays and lesbians fairly under the law." Jack would be rolling in his grave! I can't believe the Kennedys call themselves Catholic.
• The U.S.A. needs to have an official policy on marriage. Marriage is an issue of morality, and therefore it should be handled not by the states, but by the federal government.
• The amendment restricts marriage, and I support allowing as few people as possible to marry. The less marriage, the better! It even seems to ban civil unions too. (Note the phrase, "the legal incidents thereof"!)

So, although I can sort of understand some reasons why people oppose the amendment, I think the Senate made a bad decision. The American people must unite to ban gay marriage once and for all!